Friday, November 22, 2019

Initial and Mandatory Steps to Go Digital

Estimated Read Time: 6 min

It is in fact a challenge to survive and grow your business in this highly volatile digital market. Before you plan your objectives and strategies, it is mandatory for you to identify where you stand right now when considering your internal and external factors. If you know where you are, then you will be able to come up with practical objectives and strategies to achieve your digital vision.

We all know about SWOT analysis and yet we really do not know how well we can use it to shape our organizations as well as ourselves. First you need to know about your strengths. We all have strengths. Then, the question comes to our mind is what are my major strengths? You should focus on you major strengths rather than counting on other minor strengths.

To be a major strength it should create value for your organization and to your target market.  Value in terms of what? This should add value to its value chain activities which enable you to earn higher margins compared to your competitors. For an instance it can add value to human resource, infrastructure, systems etc. Value creation for customers or increasing customer value proposition. The strength should give a reason for your stakeholders to choose you or your origination over other competing offers.

Moreover, to be a strength it has to be unique. Why it has to be unique? Because, the strength has to differentiate your organization. For an example, how many digital platforms are available to make payments online? But we are using only a very few reputed platform to do it.  One of the reasons could  be the trust the brand has built over time in online payments.  Further, it has to be lasting. If you cannot sustain your strength it cannot be a major strength. For an example, Apple has sustained their ability in digital transformation in the perspective of digital innovation. Again, you can see it is all interlinked. If it can create value, of course it will drive you to be unique in the market place.  Amazon is another example who has sustained their strength across all digital platforms.

Furthermore, your major strength cannot be copied by any one easily. For an example Google holds more than 90% of the market share in SERPs. Why it is only Google? It’s because of their unique crawling & indexing mechanisms. Next, it is very complex for someone to identify their formation of search engine algorithms. Have you ever thought a strength itself can be used to analyze a substantial part of your capabilities? But, above proves how complex it is to identify your super powers and it cannot be analyzed over a short period of time.

Next internal factor is weaknesses. Again you need to analyze this internal aspect critically. If you really do not know your major weaknesses, it will be very hard for you to face market competition and other external challenges in the macro environment. There can be weaknesses which are not that critical and there are weaknesses which are critical. However, it is hard for you and your organization to identify and prioritize your weaknesses. To be a weakness it has to pass through following test.

First it has to be meaningful to your target audience. That means customer knows what your weakness is. You may have heard what outsiders talk about your company. May be complex and low user friendly processes can be a major weakness where it will be known by your consumer through negative past experience coupled with negative word of mouth. Next, it has to be unique to yourself. For an instance, if your digital marketing ability is low, how will it be unique to yourself? You might be good in digital marketing in the platforms of Facebook and LinkedIn, but not performing well in other platforms of Instagram and Google ads. On the other hand your competitors’ weakness in digital marketing will be unique to themselves.

If it is a major weakness, finally it is difficult to fix or that will take a long period of time to fix that issue. In the below video you can see we referred it as Achilles heel. In other words, if your competitor knows you weakness very well, you are in a major risk. This weakness maybe caused by a sticky resource which the organization may have had; previous success stories or investments which have not given expected returns.


Now let’s take our focus to the external aspects which are opportunities. We generally talk about opportunities, but are we capitalizing on the correct opportunities? To know the correct or suitable opportunity, first it has to be large in general. Before explaining that, the opportunity which is large for you will not be that large for your indirect competitors. For an example, you may have started a new taxi application where you will be considering your local nearby market as your opportunity, whereas a global player would not consider that market as an opportunity.

If it is an opportunity it has to accessible, if it is not accessible or hard to access, it will not be an opportunity. However, you need to equip with required capabilities and competencies in order to access your correct opportunity to explore. Further, this opportunity should last for a time period. However, with technological revolution, the lasting opportunity will be subjected to incremental changes. Finally, if you have identified a great opportunity it has to be in accordance with discussed criterion.

Next external element we discuss is threats. What facts will cause a negative impact on organization activities? Not all activities in a macro environment are going to have a negative impact on the organizational activities. Hence, you should identify what are the threats which are having critical negative impacts? In order to be a threat, it has be significant. In other words critical. You will be facing immense competition in digital marketing which is very critical where your customers are tempted to switch to a new platform due to increased value proposition. Moreover, threats also have to be lasting now. If we take the example of competition, it is long lasting.

By knowing your strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats you will have a better understanding about your current stand. But, it is much meaningful if you can deploy a strategy by the clearly analyzed elements. You can develop four strategic paths form this analysis. Those are as follows;

Strengths to Threat
Maxi-Mini strategic option: managers should think about which organizational strengths can mitigate or reduce  the threats in the environment.

Strengths to Opportunities
Maxi-Maxi strategic option: the strategic level of the organization should look at which organizational strengths can be used to exploit opportunities in the external environment.  

Weaknesses to Opportunities
Mini-Maxi strategic option: the managers should concentrate which organizational weaknesses need to be addressed on priority basis in order to grab the external environment opportunity.

Weaknesses to Threats
Mini-Mini strategic option: organizations need to focus on which organizational weaknesses need to be addressed and which threats are to be mitigated. In other words, when you focus on minimizing your major weakness over long time period, that will enable the organization to face the challenges as the thereat is mitigated.

Identifying your strengths, weaknesses, threats and opportunities cannot be done overnight. This is a continuous journey. Hence organization should have good monitoring and controlling system to be on the edge and ride on the wave of competition. Further this analysis can be developed in to the concepts of blue and red ocean strategies.

Chamara Ekanayake, ARCTube  | @echamara

Sunday, November 17, 2019

Softwarization and the Future of Telcos in Developing Markets

Estimated Read Time: 4 min 

It has been a while since the telecommunication experts came up with the idea of Softwarization, which can be considered as a broader term to describe the concept of virtualization. Surely, the Softwarization is the next major transformation of all Telcos around the world, no matter how big or small they are and the country they operate, it will be a matter of when to make the move.

Please check the below Knowledge Spark on Telco Softwarization for more information.

 

Virtualization is no more an “infant” technology as it is well matured not only as a concept but also as a solution, even though still there are several related aspects which need further improvements. Almost all the major telecommunication equipment manufacturers have shown clear signs of focusing on this concept in their future developments and some have already taken open approaches and come up with their own solutions.

Is it the right time to adopt this concept? Are we lagging behind? Are we going to embrace it ahead of others or wait till someone else tries it out? These are some questions which the Telcos may have in their mind-set at the moment. The common answer for all these questions is “It depends on where you are and what you do right now”.
 
If we narrow down our focus and concentrate more on developing markets in the Asia-Pacific (APAC), they were among the first movers in adopting 3rd and 4th generation mobile technologies even though there was a significant confusion among the Telcos on emerging technologies. Market saturation, level of competition, customer expectations and past experience were among the factors which drove them from behind. In most of the cases, there were happy endings, because being first to the market helped them to harvest in a blue ocean which let them to attract the majority of the newly created markets.

Will this strategy work in Softwarization as well? May be “Yes”. Then why don’t they get it implemented as fast as before? That is the next question most of the people would ask. Well, that also has an answer.

Firstly, it should be realized that Softwarization will add more value from the operator’s perspective, such as flexibility, customization, short development cycles, cost effectiveness and so on. But from the customer’s perspective it adds little or nothing since the customer cares only on the service he/she gets and how it is delivered is beyond their concern.

Secondly, most of the Telcos have already spent a pile of money on legacy systems and hardware, which are yet to be fully depreciated and even the cost has not yet recovered. They feel like it is still too early to throw away the special purpose hardware for some general purpose hardware. That makes it harder to start the journey with virtualization and they may stick to these systems for another few years.

Next, it seems there is a degree of uncertainty among the operators about the new concepts and how long those will remain valid. As described by the Moore’s Law where the power of computing gets doubled in every eighteen months, new concepts and technologies emerge and disappear in short periods. What we see as the best might get out-dated in few years’ time.

Finally, in some cases, the bitter experience of operators may also slow down their speed of adopting new technologies and concepts. I have met several operators who had the bad experience of being the first movers and then becoming a test bed for some equipment manufacturers. These concerns will reduce the attractiveness and the speed of adoption to some extent.

My belief is that even though all these concerns are valid, Softwarization is the way to move forward form where we are right now. The vendor support on legacy hardware reduces day by day while the risk of keeping those increases considerably. On the other hand Telcos are nowadays seeking for more cost effective, less complicated and flexible solutions which gradually drive them towards the virtualization. It can be either tomorrow or some years later, slowly but surely the time will come for them to go for it.

Rajiv Weragama, ARCTube | @RajivWeragama

Note: The 1st version of this article appeared at  https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/softwarization-future-telcos-developing-markets-rajiv-weragama/

Thursday, November 7, 2019

Can we fully "automate" a telecom network?


Estimated Read Time: 3 min

Traditionally, the Operation, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) of telecom networks and systems have been hugely dependent on humans. Human intervention is required at different levels, mainly at hardware and software. The dependency is more prevalent with wire-line operators as compared to wireless operators. While this had its benefits in the past, with multiple changes of different magnitude happening in the surrounding, too much dependency on humans on telco operations has sometimes become really inefficient and unproductive. 

Telecom operators use different business models to source the human services required. These include in-house, partly outsourced and fully outsourced, etc. But in the long run, all these models have their own defects due to various reasons. As telecom networks transform from Circuit Switched based (mainly TDM) OGNs (Old Generation Networks) to Packet Switched (mainly IP/Ethernet) based NGNs (Next Generation Networks) to virtualized NGNs (vNGN) or Software Generation Networks (SGNs), certain amount of the work done by the humans could be automated, increasing the efficiency and productivity of the overall operations.

Please check the below Knowledge Spark on Telco Digital Transformation by ARC Tube.




SGN, which includes virtualization of the network [Software Defined Networking (SDN)] and network functions [Network Functions Virtualization (NFV)], bring in automation and agility to telecom networks at different levels. With proper orchestration of different resources, an end to end service across different network segments and systems could be provided almost automatically.
What if the user requests a "telecom" service online through a web portal and is automatically provisioned and delivered within seconds?

While online service requests and automatic service delivery is common with Internet based web scale companies, telecom service delivery has traditionally includes many human interventions at different points. This is common for service management as well. There are obvious areas in a telecom domain, where we can NOT practically introduce automation. These include, but not limited to, wires (copper, cable, fiber), towers, antennas, chassis, cards and power supplies. However, once these basic building blocks are in place and properly connected, the rest can be easily automated with proper implementation and usage of software. Software is a very powerful tool and the code has really become the king, not only in telecom space, but also in many other areas.

If the network intelligence is logically centralized, few experts can manage everything from anywhere. Physical intervention is required only when there's something to do with hardware and you can do it with a properly trained set of staff easily. To achieve this, many things need to put in place as listed below.
  • Virtualizing networks, network elements and systems wherever possible.
  • Abstracting different levels of the network to a software layer using SDN.
  • Virtualizing network fictions of the operator using NFV.
  • Virualizing the end customer services delivers across the network and systems using NFV and Virtual Customer Premises Equipment (vCPE), where the Virtual Network Functions (VNFs) are located inside the vCPE, at the network edge or in the cloud. The vCPEs are essentially plug-and-play and self-serviced by the customers themselves.
  • Orchestrating the resources and the services.
  • Re-architecture of traditional Central Offices (COs) or Local Exchanges (LEs) to be mini Data Centers (DC) to host VNFs. CORD (Central Office Re-architected as a Datacenter) can be used for this purpose effectively.
Above need not happen at once or in the order above, but a proper strategy and a plan with realistic timelines can deliver results step-by-step as different capabilities are released at appropriate times.

Anuradha Udunuwara, ARC Tube | @AnuradhaU

Coronavirus and Global Tech Events

3 minute read The world has faced yet another massive threat to the mankind in the recent history – Coronavirus disease ...